We have changed our privacy policy. In addition, we use cookies on our website for various purposes. By continuing on our website, you consent to our use of cookies. You can learn about our practices by reading our privacy policy.

Erich Auerbach's Dispute: Major Arguments

Erich Auerbach's Dispute: Major Arguments

I know what you're thinking—"Not more about Mimesis! Please!"

Okay, okay. But I just want to leave you with a short P.S., and that is this: I am more than the author of that modest survey of several thousand years of Western literature. Among academics, I am known as that quintessential outsider: the intellectual émigré, chased out by evildoers but never robbed of my dignity or ability to produce breathtaking works of critical interpretation. In short: I'm a survivor.

You know by now that I just loved everyday life. If I had a motto, it would be something like: "Look at social, military, economic, domestic, and all cultural details to really understand a book. What food characters eat and what they stare at—those things matter."

Or maybe something pithier.

Anyway, my point is that it's the moment that matters—that's why rushing through a book will get you nowhere. You may miss the one word that tells you the most about the historical context of the literature.

As you know, I have suffered. But I am still a people person. You'd never find me making a snobby remark: I love people from all classes and all corners of the world. I'm not into hierarchies; I like democracy, and I like realism.