ShmoopTube

Where Monty Python meets your 10th grade teacher.

Search Thousands of Shmoop Videos


Institutions of National Government Videos 15 videos

AP U.S. Government 2.5 Institutions of National Government
213 Views

AP U.S. Government 2.5 Institutions of National Government. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court assert the federal government's p...

AP U.S. Government 1.1 Institutions of National Government
280 Views

AP U.S. Government 1.1 Institutions of National Government. What was the scale of representation in the House of Representatives when the Constitut...

AP U.S. Government 3.4 Institutions of National Government
187 Views

AP U.S. Government 3.4 Institutions of National Government. How many justices must agree to hear a case for the Court to grant cert?

See All

AP U.S. Government 2.5 Institutions of National Government 213 Views


Share It!


Description:

AP U.S. Government 2.5 Institutions of National Government. In which of the following cases did the Supreme Court assert the federal government's power to regulate interstate trade?

Language:
English Language

Transcript

00:00

Thank you We sneak man here's your smoke too Sure

00:05

brought to you by interstate trade the federal market for

00:08

your rights of way All right In which of the

00:11

following cases did the supreme court assert the federal government's

00:14

power to regulate interstate trade and hear the potential answers

00:19

You get some good ones here Well the constitution gives

00:23

the federal government the power to regulate interstate commerce which

00:26

refers to trade between states or trade that affects the

00:29

national economy Like when the state of california exports more

00:32

than eighty percent of its almonds overseas Pretty nutty right

00:37

All right Did the supreme court assert the federal government's

00:40

power to regulate the interstate trade in a marbury versus

00:43

madison Well m v m wasn't about regulating trade It

00:47

was about regulating whether or not supreme court could compel

00:49

an official the hand over political appointments Chief justice john

00:53

marshall decided his band of judges couldn't actually do that

00:56

and the court struck down part of the judiciary act

00:59

of seventeen eighty nine the first time the supremes ruled

01:02

a national lot of the unconstitutional did the supreme court

01:05

first to certain federal government's ability to regulate interstate trade

01:09

In bee little bee marine well l v b was

01:12

in fact about trade but it had more to do

01:15

with disagreements between how the president and congress imposed restrictions

01:19

on trade and well really anything else after the x

01:22

y z affair when french diplomats demanded bribes from u

01:26

s officials before entering into negotiations between the two countries

01:30

john adams wanted to retaliate against france's sleight of ah

01:35

hand So congress passed a law allowing the navy to

01:38

seize us ship sailing to a french port But adam's

01:41

ordered the navy to seize ships sailing from f french

01:44

port as well The supreme court found that executive action

01:48

to be unconstitutional telling john adams that well he couldn't

01:51

really go both ways If the supreme court deal with

01:55

interstate trade in see fletcher v peck will fletcher v

01:59

peck was more about the validity of contracts than of

02:02

interstate trade After georgia lawmakers repeal the yazoo land act

02:07

Fletcher and peck whose land was seized after the law

02:11

was invalidated took their case all the way to the

02:13

supreme court Well the supreme court ruled that the repeal

02:16

was unconstitutional since it jeopardized the sanctity of the constitution's

02:21

Contract clause what about a mcauliffe v maryland Mccullough femoral

02:26

and banked on a controversy over the implied powers of

02:28

congress The state of maryland imposed taxes on a u

02:31

s national bank which we can imagine congress was none

02:34

too pleased with and supreme court ended up ruling that

02:37

congress not only had the ability to set up a

02:39

bank but also that maryland state law was secondary to

02:42

any federal legislation This particular case didn't really trade on

02:46

issues of interstate trade which means the supreme court asserted

02:50

the federal government's power to regulate interstate trade in d

02:54

gibbons be ogden well gibbons and ogden were at loggerheads

02:57

over who held the license to operate a steamboat between

03:00

new jersey and new york ogden claimed he had first

03:03

did since he purchased his license from the state of

03:06

new york years earlier Givens though obtained his rite of

03:10

passage from the u s congress the big cheeses Well

03:14

in a watershed decision the supreme court declared that gibbons

03:17

had sailed to victory saying that the u s had

03:20

authority over states when it came to regulating interstate commerce

03:25

So d is the correct answer and to this day

03:27

the power to regulate interstate commerce remains an important trick

03:30

of the trade for the u s government's economic agenda

Related Videos

AP U.S. Government 1.1 Institutions of National Government
280 Views

AP U.S. Government 1.1 Institutions of National Government. What was the scale of representation in the House of Representatives when the Constitut...

AP U.S. Government 2.2 Public Policy
39 Views

AP U.S. Government 2.2 Public Policy. What did the Budget Impoundment Control Act do?

AP U.S. Government 2.3 Civil Rights and Liberties
14 Views

AP U.S. Government 2.3 Civil Rights and Liberties. Classifications based on sexual orientation receive...what?

AP U.S. Government 1.3 Political Beliefs and Behaviors
5 Views

AP U.S. Government 1.3 Political Beliefs and Behaviors. What sort of poll would you commission to monitor popularity over three months?

AP U.S. Government 2.3 Constitutional Foundations
235 Views

AP U.S. Government 2.3 Constitutional Foundations. Which amendment stated that the right to vote could not be denied on the basis of race?