ShmoopTube

00:00

Thank you We sneak and who's your shmoop too sure

00:05

brought to you by the sins where kids of all

00:08

ages can have a blast acting as sadistic and murderous

00:11

overlords are well here's your question whose research would be

00:15

most likely to study how the presence of one event

00:18

in the environment signals that something else is about to

00:22

occur Your answers are whose research you know All right

00:28

when you're discussing the occurrence of events within a context

00:30

of psychology you're very often talking about behaviour And while

00:34

three of our potential answers were behaviorist two of them

00:37

were not let's start by eliminating those outsiders first to

00:40

go Charles darwin's garland was a naturalist and geologist best

00:45

known for his contributions to the theory of evolution and

00:47

natural selection So naturally he's not our god Sorry chuck

00:51

we're contractually obligated to seize any and all ton opportunity

00:55

I'm as lo is the other non behaviorist on our

00:57

list he's best known for creating his hierarchy of needs

01:00

which stated that one should deal with their most pressing

01:03

need before concerning themselves with their next highest names So

01:07

basically once physiological needs like food and water would need

01:10

To be met before worrying about resource is health and

01:13

employment which would in turn needs be met before they

01:17

worry about friendship and intimacy Unless you're a sense then

01:20

all bets are off all right onto our behaviorist starting

01:23

with john b watson watson was a psychologist known for

01:27

establishing the school of beef abe you're ism his work

01:30

with animals and children focused on offering conditioning which is

01:34

the study of how rewarding punishment affects the likelihood of

01:37

a behavior occurring again well are inquisitive Sim thinks the

01:40

best way to make a new friend is to throw

01:42

pineapples of their head while clucking like a chicken Other

01:45

sins don't agree and because our sin doesn't enjoy being

01:48

slapped he'll learn to adjust his behavior and not do

01:51

it again While it's fun to watch this type of

01:53

research isn't what we're after so we can eliminate watson

01:56

Bf skinner was a behavior as much life watson but

01:59

his shared into just an operator conditioning means we can

02:01

eliminate him for similar reasons No hard feelings guys take

02:05

a load off We've got a great game you can

02:07

play well that leaves us just with pavlak best known

02:10

for his experiment involving a drooling dog and a ringing

02:13

bell pavlov didn't study offering conditioning But instead classical conditioning

02:18

which looked at how one stimulus can signal the approach

02:21

of another cavallo's famous experiment with dogs involved providing them

02:25

with the tree and ringing a bell Each time the

02:27

treat was presented the dog would salivate Will eventually pavlov

02:30

remove the presence of the treat and would simply ring

02:33

the bell The dogs had grown accustomed to associating the

02:36

bell with tree in turn would salivate at the very

02:38

sound of the bell Well this clearly showed the presence

02:41

of one event in the environment singling the occurrence of

02:44

another and that's exactly what we're looking for It's Also

02:47

why we often called classical conditioning pavlovian conditioning a term

02:51

which will forever be conditioned to associate with the presence

02:54

of roast dog slobber Break Now someone stopped watson and 00:02:58.393 --> [endTime] skinner has clearly gone too far

Full Transcript